Wine
Talk
(By
Michael Tabone)
Saint-Emilion
Classification 2006
The much awaited re
classification of the wines of Saint-Emilion was announced on the 7th
of September 2006. Wine lovers everywhere were anxiously waiting for the
announcement as unlike any other system of grading wines in France, this
classification is reviewed and upgraded every ten years or so, and hence ,
in theory, it keeps the classed properties in check. It ensures that
recognised chateaux maintain standards on the pain of declassification and
it encourages others to improve hoping for better distinction.
The Classification
committee is appointed by the INAO (The national institute that runs the
Appellation of Origin) following proposals made by the people of Saint-Emilion
and is made up of 9 members. This year they came from various wine sectors
, including oenological, soil science, brokerage, legal and economic
representatives taking in consideration all aspects in the life of a
chateau.
Any property wanting to
maintain or be incorporated in the system must submit an application which
include commercial documents, an inventory of the estate, history of
marketing, reputation of wine, press write ups , samples of the previous 10
vintages are just some of the requirements in the application file. With
this, a number of criteria must be satisfied and undertaken . Age of
vines, chateau bottling, promise not to modify the estate, and so on.
The first classification
took place in 1955 exactly 100 years after the static, but well established
1855 classification of the Medoc and Sauternes. It distinguished 12 Premiers
Grands Crus Classes and 63 Grands Crus Classes. There have been reviews in
1969, 1986 and 1996. This last one incorporated 55 Grands Crus Classes, 11
Premiers Grands Crus Classes (B) and 2 Premiers Grands Crus Classes (A).
Changes in 2006
A number of important
changes took place this year and for the next 10 years the Classification of
Saint-Emilion will stand with 15 Premiers Grands Crus Classes (2 A and 13 B)
and 46 Grands Crus Classes.
Representing the most
important change is the anticipated promotion to Premiers (B) of Ch Troplong
Mondot and Ch Pavie-Macquin. Both have been producing fantastic wines for a
number of years. In the case of Troplong this goes back 30 or so years.
Christine Valette, the
owner, has spent a lifetime and all her energy in taking the quality here to
the very highest levels which attracted a very high world wide reputation,
demand and price for the wine. All of which will no doubt increase even
further with this distinction. Well deserved. The elevation of Pavie –Macquin
was a sure thing simply based on the exceptional aspect and situation of the
vineyard. Just above Ch Pavie on the famous south facing Pavie slope.
Other important promotions
were the re incorporation to Grand Cru Classe of Ch Grand Corbin and
Chateau Grand Corbin Despagne. These were part of the original 1955
classification but were not included in 1996, mainly due to family
problems. Both Philippe Giraud and Francois Despagne have worked hard to
achieve this re integration with huge investments in the winery and in
marketing.
The Controversial Mr Gerard
Perse has been awarded with Grand Cru Classe for his Ch Monbusquet. That
this wine is good is no big secret. It was good before Perse bought it in
1993 . However he did manage to bring it to the very bright limelight
achieving an incredible reputation and prices to match. This announcement
is quite ground breaking and no doubt will have repercussions in the next
classification in 2016 as with this, Monbusquet becomes the sole classed
property in the less highly regarded flat area of St Sulpice where sandy
soils dominate and where usually, early drinking wines are produced. No
doubt this will give a lot of encouragement and hopefulness to Monbusquet’s
neighbours and other less regarded areas of Saint-Emilion. Not a bad thing
at all.
The excellent Ch Bellefont-
Bercier has also been given Classes status. This property have achieved
enourmous success in the last few years with great wines especially in the
1998 and 2000 vintages. Ch Fleur Cardinal was also upgraded. A promotion
which many feel was not merited, especially since if anything, improvements
have only taken place in the last 2 years. The other incorporation at
Classe level was the promotion of the rather unknown Ch Destieux. I don’t
ever recall tasting this wine so I cannot comment. No doubt I will get the
chance during my visit to Saint Emilion next week.
Now for the sad stories.
13 properties were not re classified for various reasons. I suppose the
easiest two to explain is the disappearance of Ch Cure Bon which was
integrated with Ch Canon and Chateau de Jacobins which changed its name to
Clos de Jacobins. The 2 properties Ch La Tour du Pin Figeac (Giraud and
Mouiex) were refused because of serious family problems which effected the
quality and market positioning of the wines. I would not be surprised if
these properties will become for sale soon.
The most contraversial
refusals for me were Ch Tertre Daugay and Petit Faurie de Soutard.
Especially in the latter huge investments were made in the cellar and the
quality of the wine is surely not in question. I rather think that it was a
question of marketing. As the owner has 2 other classed properties (Balestard
la Tonnelle and Cap de Mourlin) besides being Premier Jurat amongst many
other titles and responsibilities, Petit Faurie lacked the attention that a
property of this magnitude requires. The demotion of Tertre Daugay was also
a big shock to the St Emilionais. Many believe that this property which is
owned by the same family that owns the 1ere, Ch La Gaffeliere has been
producing wines not to the potential of it’s rather special terroir on the
Daugay slopes.
Ch Bellvue, Ch Cadet Bon,
Ch Faurie de Souchard, Ch Gaudet St Julien, Ch Villemaurine and Ch Yon
Figeac were the other non re classified chateaux.
Finally, here are some
disappointing headline announcements for hopeful properties. Once again Ch
Figeac was refused elevation to Premier (A) from (B) on grounds of price.
Strangely no one doubts the quality of the wine but the fact that it sells
for much less than Ausone and Cheval Blanc penalises the Manoncourt family,
owners of Figeac. The same applies for the excellent Ch Grand Mayne.
Francoise Nony , the owmer , applied to be upgraded to premier (B) but also
was refused because of price. This price factor, which plays an important
role in the evaluations, has caused a lot of animosity between the various
hopeful properties and the deciding authorities.
Of course the rather
ridiculous attempt by Luc Thunevin to integrate Ch de Valandraud straight
as Premier (A) and the second wine, Virginie de Valandraud as Premier (B)
was ignored completely for a number of reasons. Size of landholding,
history of the wine and the fragmented aspect of the vineyards determined
the guaranteed outcome.
In Malta most were
expecting Ch Carteau Cotes Daugay to be elevated to Classe. This did not
take place as in the last minute the Bertrand Family decided not to apply.
Anne Marie Bertrand explained that some members of the family were concerned
that the eventual and nearly mandatory price rise would have effected
negatively the long term prospects of the Chateau. Anne Marie reckons that
in 2016, they will have no option but to apply.
Finally Ch Canon La
Gaffeliere was refused elevation to Premier (B) as the owner Stephan von
Neipperg did not want to split his vineyard into a Premier and a Classe
part. As the vineyard has a distinctive slope and plain aspect the higher
classification would have only been offered for the slope part. Stephan,
who incidentally was in Malta at the end of July, clearly indicated that he
is not ready to do this. He argues, and indeed I agree that the higher
Classification is not worth the loss of part of the vineyard with a doubtful
wine quality result. For lovers of Canon La Gaffeliere Premier or Classe
does not really have any significance. This type of deal based on the same
situation has already been done in the classification of 1996 when Ch
Angelus demoted part of it’s vineyard on the plain to producing Angelus’s
second wine , Carillon D’Angelus.
Overview
Being the only regularly
revised classification in France, the St Emilion system is in principal a
good system. In theory in punishes and it rewards properties on their
performance of the previous 10 years. However the criterias used are of
doubtable relevance. As Mr Manoncourt told me. He would not begrudge his
refusal if he was refused on quality issues. But to be penalised for
keeping reasonable prices is illogical and damaging. Some properties are
debating taking legal action against the system.
CLASSEMENT DES CRUS DE SAINT-EMILION
2006
PREMIERS GRANDS CRUS CLASSÉS
A :
Château Ausone
Château Cheval Blanc
B : Château Angélus
Château Beauséjour (Duffau-lagarrosse)
Château Beau-Séjour-Bécot Château
Belair
Château Canon
Château Figeac
Château La Gaffelière
Château Magdelaine
Château Pavie
Château Pavie-Macquin
Château Troplong-Mondot Château
Trottevieille
Clos Fourtet
GRANDS CRUS CLASSÉS
Château Balestard la Tonnelle Château
Bellefont-Belcier
Château Bergat
Château Berliquet
Château Cadet Piola
Château Canon la Gaffelière
Château Cap de Mourlin
Château Chauvin
Château Corbin
Château Corbin Michotte
Château Dassault
Château Destieux
Château Fleur-Cardinale
Château Fonplégade
Château Fonroque
Château Franc Mayne
Château Grand Corbin
Château Grand Corbin Despagne
Château Grand Mayne
Château Grand Pontet
Château Haut Corbin
Château Haut Sarpe
Château L’Arrosée
Château La Clotte
Château La Couspaude
Château La Dominique
Château La Serre
Château La Tour Figeac
Château Laniote
Château Larcis Ducasse
Château Larmande
Château Laroque
Château Laroze
Château Le Prieuré
Château Les Grandes Murailles Château
Matras
Château Monbousquet
Château Moulin du Cadet
Château Pavie-Decesse
Château Ripeau
Château Saint-Georges-Côte-Pavie Château
Soutard
Clos de l’Oratoire
Clos des Jacobins
Clos Saint-Martin
Couvent des Jacobins